The Priapus Shot: Revolutionizing Men’s Sexual Health and Confidence
- Dr. Iman Bar, M.D.
- 5 days ago
- 6 min read
The Priapus Shot, or P-Shot, has emerged as a promising non-surgical procedure aimed at enhancing male sexual function and addressing cosmetic concerns. By leveraging the body’s natural healing mechanisms, the P-Shot offers potential benefits for men seeking improved performance, sensitivity, or even penile enlargement. This blog explores the procedure, its history, benefits, cosmetic applications, and how it compares to other modern penile enlargement options, supported by research from PubMed and other credible sources.
What is the Priapus Shot?
Procedure Overview
The Priapus Shot is a minimally invasive treatment that uses platelet-rich plasma (PRP) derived from the patient’s own blood. The process involves the following steps:
Blood Draw: A small amount of blood is drawn from the patient, typically from the arm.
PRP Preparation: The blood is placed in a centrifuge to separate the platelet-rich plasma, which is rich in growth factors and ~2 % stem cells that promote tissue repair and regeneration.
Injection: After applying a local anesthetic to the penis, the PRP is injected into specific areas, such as the corpus cavernosum, to stimulate tissue growth and improve blood flow.
The procedure takes about 30 minutes, is performed in an outpatient setting, and requires little to no downtime. Patients can typically resume normal activities shortly after.
History of the P-Shot
The P-Shot was developed by Dr. Charles Runels in the early 2010s, building on the growing use of PRP in fields like orthopedics and dermatology. Named after Priapus, the Greek god of fertility, the procedure was initially designed to address erectile dysfunction (ED) and enhance sexual performance. Its potential cosmetic benefits, such as increased penile size, emerged as a secondary advantage, gaining attention in the aesthetic medicine community. While PRP therapies have been studied for decades, the P-Shot’s application to penile health is relatively new, with ongoing research to validate its efficacy.
Benefits of the Priapus Shot
The P-Shot is marketed as a versatile treatment with both functional and aesthetic benefits. Below are the primary advantages based on anecdotal reports and emerging research.
Improved Erectile Function
The P-Shot aims to enhance blood flow and tissue regeneration in the penis, potentially improving the quality of erections. Animal studies have shown that PRP can improve erectile function in models with cavernous nerve injuries, and early clinical studies report subjective improvements in erection firmness. For example, a 2023 study found that platelet lysate injections enhanced erectile function in men with ED, both objectively and subjectively.
Increased Sensitivity and Pleasure
By promoting nerve regeneration and tissue health, the P-Shot may heighten penile sensitivity, leading to improved sexual satisfaction. Anecdotal reports from patients suggest enhanced sensation, though robust clinical data is still limited.
Potential Size Increase
Some men report a modest increase in penile length and girth (10-20%) after the P-Shot, particularly when combined with a vacuum pump. This cosmetic benefit is attributed to PRP’s ability to stimulate tissue growth and vascularization. However, results vary, and more research is needed to confirm these outcomes.
Treatment for Peyronie’s Disease
The P-Shot may help reduce penile curvature caused by Peyronie’s disease by decreasing fibrosis and promoting healthier tissue. A 2020 study noted a reduction in penile curvature after PRP injections in men with Peyronie’s disease, suggesting a therapeutic role.
Minimal Risks and Side Effects
Since the P-Shot uses autologous PRP, the risk of allergic reactions or rejection is low. Side effects, such as mild bruising or swelling at the injection site, are typically temporary. However, the procedure’s safety profile is largely based on anecdotal evidence, and more rigorous studies are needed.
P-Shot for Cosmetic Penile Enlargement?
The P-Shot’s role in cosmetic penile enlargement is a topic of growing interest. While primarily marketed for functional improvements, the procedure’s ability to promote tissue and vascular growth has led to claims of size enhancement. Patient reports suggest a 10-20% increase in length and girth, particularly when combined with post-procedure protocols like vacuum pumps. However, these outcomes are not universally guaranteed.
A 2021 study on PRP and stem cell therapies noted that these treatments can promote new cellular and vascular growth in penile tissue, which could theoretically contribute to size increases. Yet, the study emphasized that results are inconsistent and depend on factors like patient health and practitioner technique. In my patients I combine peptides like GHK and PT 141 to increase size and enhance performance.
Comparing the P-Shot to Other Penile Enlargement Options
The field of penile enlargement has evolved, with both non-surgical and surgical options available. Below, we compare the P-Shot to other modern methods, drawing on research from PubMed.
Hyaluronic Acid (HA) Fillers
Overview: HA fillers are injected into the penile shaft to increase girth. They are biocompatible and reversible, making them a popular non-surgical option.
Benefits: Studies show HA fillers can increase penile girth by approximately 2.0-2.5 cm, with effects lasting 6-18 months. They are safe, with minimal complications when performed by experienced practitioners.
Comparison to P-Shot: HA fillers offer more immediate and predictable girth enhancement than the P-Shot, but they do not improve erectile function or sensitivity. The P-Shot’s effects may be longer-lasting due to tissue regeneration, but size gains are less consistent. In my practice I like to combine both procedures.
Polylactic Acid (PLA) and Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMA) Fillers
Overview: PLA and PMA fillers are used for penile augmentation, with PLA stimulating collagen production and PMA offering permanent results.
Benefits: A 2023 study found that PLA and PMA fillers provided significant girth enhancement, with PMA offering longer-lasting results. However, PMA carries a higher risk of complications, such as nodules or asymmetry.
Comparison to P-Shot: These fillers provide more dramatic girth increases than the P-Shot but lack functional benefits like improved erections. The P-Shot’s autologous nature makes it safer than PMA, which is non-reversible.
Surgical Penile Augmentation
Overview: Surgical options include ligament release for length and fat grafting or implants for girth. These are invasive procedures with longer recovery times.
Benefits: A 2022 systematic review reported a mean length gain of 2.8 cm with ligament release, though 20% of patients experienced decreased glans sensitivity. Girth enhancement via fat grafting can be significant but may require touch-ups due to fat reabsorption.
Comparison to P-Shot: Surgery offers more substantial size increases but carries higher risks, including deformity, scarring, and functional compromise. The P-Shot is safer and less invasive but provides subtler cosmetic results.
Penile Prosthesis
Overview: Inflatable penile prostheses (IPPs) are primarily used for severe ED but can enhance perceived size by restoring rigidity.
Benefits: IPPs are effective for ED unresponsive to other treatments, with high patient satisfaction. They do not significantly increase flaccid size.
Comparison to P-Shot: IPPs are a last resort for ED and not primarily cosmetic, unlike the P-Shot, which offers both functional and aesthetic benefits with minimal invasiveness.
Research Gaps and Future Directions
While the P-Shot shows promise, its evidence base is limited. Most studies are small, lack controls, or rely on subjective outcomes. A 2024 review emphasized the need for larger, randomized controlled trials to verify the P-Shot’s efficacy for ED, Peyronie’s disease, and cosmetic enlargement. Similarly, while HA fillers and surgical options have more robust data, long-term outcomes and complication rates require further exploration.
Future research should focus on standardizing PRP preparation and injection protocols to ensure consistent results. For cosmetic enlargement, comparative studies between PRP, HA fillers, and surgical methods could guide patient decision-making.
Conclusion
The Priapus Shot offers a compelling option for men seeking to improve sexual function, sensitivity, and potentially penile size without surgery. Its benefits include enhanced erections, reduced penile curvature, and a low-risk profile, though cosmetic size gains are modest and variable. Compared to HA fillers, which provide predictable girth enhancement, or surgical options, which offer significant but risky size increases, the P-Shot balances safety and versatility. However, more rigorous research is needed to solidify its place in men’s health.
For those considering the P-Shot or other enlargement options, consulting a qualified practitioner and reviewing the latest research is crucial. As the field evolves, advancements in PRP and filler technologies may further refine these treatments, offering men safer and more effective solutions for confidence and performance.
Comments